Japan urges limiting kids' cell phones




By YURI KAGEYAMA, AP Business Writer



The government is worried about how elementary and junior high school students are getting sucked into cyberspace crimes, spending long hours exchanging mobile e-mail and suffering other negative effects of cell phone overuse, Masaharu Kuba, a government official overseeing the initiative, said Tuesday.

"Japanese parents are giving cell phones to their children without giving it enough thought," he said. "In Japan, cell phones have become an expensive toy."

The recommendations have been submitted from an education reform panel to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda's administration, and were approved this week.

The panel is also asking Japanese makers to develop cell phones with only the talking function, and GPS, or global positioning system, a satellite-navigation feature that can help ensure a child's safety.

About a third of Japanese sixth graders have cell phones, while 60 percent of ninth graders have them, according to the education ministry.

Most mobile phones in Japan are sophisticated gadgets offering high-speed Internet access called 3G, for "third-generation."

But the panel said better filtering programming is needed for Internet access to protect children.

Some youngsters are spending hours at night on e-mail with their friends. One fad is "the 30 minute rule," in which a child who doesn't respond to e-mail within half an hour gets targeted and picked on by other schoolmates.

Other youngsters have become victims of Internet crimes. In one case, children sent in their own snapshots to a Web site and then ended up getting threatened for money, Kuba said.

Cell phones tend to be more personal tools than personal computers. Parents find that what their children are doing with them are increasingly difficult to monitor, Kuba said.

Some Japanese children commute long distances by trains and buses to schools and cram-schools and parents rely on cell phones to keep in touch with their children.

Parents typically pay about 4,000 yen ($39) a month for cell phone fees per child.

Japan boasts a relatively low crime rate compared to other industrialized nations, but some people are concerned that the Internet could be exploited for serious crimes.

This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog

Borders returns to Web retailing after 7 years




By DAVID RUNK, Associated Press Writer



Borders Group IncAmazon

The move comes as Borders, which has said it may put itself up for sale, has lost market share both to online retailers and to discounters such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. amid a difficult economic climate in the United States.

It's a long shot, analysts say, in an environment where people are spending less and Amazon rules.

"Amazon just dominates," said Fred Crawford, managing director at turnaround consultant AlixPartners who has studied consumer attitudes toward major booksellers. "Amazon is nearly unassailable."

In 2001, Borders abandoned its money-losing online business, turning it over to Amazon. Under that arrangement, Borders took shoppers to a site partnered with Amazon, while a Web site for its stores allowed shoppers to check inventories and reserve items.

Seattle-based Amazon says it doesn't comment on the strategies of other companies and didn't have any comment on the end of the Borders partnership.

Tuesday's launch of Borders' new Web site comes more than two months after the Ann Arbor-based company announced it may put itself up for sale. Just last week, Barnes & Noble Inc. confirmed it put together a team to study the feasibility of a deal.

___

On the Net:

Borders Group Inc.: http://www.borders

This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog

RIAA Drops Suit Against AllofMP3.com




Mark Hachman - ExtremeTech



This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog

Yahoo files suit against lottery spammers

Yahoo Inc

Yahoo filed the lawsuit on May 16 in U.S. District Court in New York City under federal trademark law, federal anti-spam law and other state laws.

In its court filing, Yahoo contends that the defendants masqueraded as the Internet company, sending out e-mails claiming recipients had won prizes ranging from a few thousand to a million dollars and instructing them to click on a link or forward personal information to a "Yahoo lottery coordinator" to get their prize.

At times, recipients were instructed to contact another party to arrange for the prize payment, Yahoo said in the filing, and this other party would charge them "hundreds of dollars in various processing and mailing charges in order to complete the payment process."

Yahoo noted in the filing that it does not offer any such prizes and has no connection with the group or the e-mails it sent.

Such "phishing" scams are meant to trick consumers into sharing financial information.

Although the defendants' identities are unknown, Yahoo thinks that information acquired during a discovery period from third-party e-mail service companies will lead to their identification.

"The unauthorized use of Yahoo's trademarks is misleading, fraudulent, and has actually confused, misled, and deceived the public," said Joe Siino, senior vice president of Yahoo global intellectual property and business strategy, in a statement on Tuesday.

Yahoo is seeking an end to the companies' practices and unspecified damages.

Several days before Yahoo filed its suit, a federal judge ordered a notorious "Spam King" and his partner to pay News Corp.-owned online hangout MySpace about $230 million in damages — a sum that is thought to be the largest ever anti-spam judgment.

Service providers have a hard time collecting such awards, though, as it is often hard to track down defendants.

This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog

EU Security Agency Wants Social Network Scrutiny




Paul Meller, IDG News Service




Europe's top Internet security agency, ENISA, called Tuesday for new legislation to police social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace.

"Social networking sites are very useful social tools but we must make recommendations for how to better protect people from the risks these sites create," said Andreas Pirotti, executive director of ENISA (European Network and Information Security Agency).


He suggested that EU legislation be expanded "to cover the taking of photos of people and posting them on the internet," he said, adding that currently there is no need to get a person's consent in order to post a photo of them.

He also said there is a "crucial need" to raise awareness about how social networking sites work. Few people realize that they can be offered up as friends to people they don't know. Also, many people don't realize that it's almost impossible to erase material once it has appeared on the internet, Pirotti said.


ENISA was created in 2004 as a temporary body to oversee online security measures across the 27 countries of the E.U. It was supposed to finish its mandate in 2009 but the European Commission wants to extend its tenure up to 2011.

The Commission is also proposing beefing up ENISA by merging it with an EU-wide telecom regulator. This idea is one of the more controversial proposals in a broad revamping of EU telecom rules that is currently being debated by national governments and the European Parliament.


Pirotti said network security is constantly under threat from spammers and criminals. An estimated 6 million computers around the world are believed to be infected and used as part of so-called botnet networks by criminals without the computer's owners realizing, he said.

"Internet security is extremely important, considering how much business takes place online now. We don't want infrastructures to be disrupted, we don't want a digital 9/11 to happen," he said.


While the bulk of spam has disappeared from email in-boxes, it still costs Internet service providers a lot of money. ENISA estimates that spam which is caught by the ISP before it is forwarded to people's e-mail boxes accounts for 94 percent of all e-mail sent.

"Because you don't see so much spam anymore you may think the problem is limited, but it isn't. The spam problem is growing and ISPs are paying for it," Pirotti said.

This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog

Carl's Jr. has appetite for online entertainment




By Andrew Wallenstein



Carl's Jr

Just as Anheuser-Busch launched its own hub for original
video programming last year in the form of Bud.TV, Carl's Jr.
wants to target young males with edgy comedic webisodes.

Brad Haley, executive vice president marketing for Carl's
Jr., confirmed his company was interested in shifting away from
traditional digital advertising, but cautioned the initiative
was in an exploratory phase.

"We've been intrigued by some ideas, but at this point we
haven't made commitments to anybody," he said, noting that its
CKE Restaurants Inc. corporate sibling Hardee's also might
adopt such an approach.

Haley said the proposed programming could be in the vein of
Carl's Jr.'s ballyhooed 2005 TV commercial featuring a
bikini-clad Paris Hilton washing a Bentley, which became one of
Internet video's first viral hits.

"Sometimes it relies on sexuality to be edgy but it doesn't
always," Haley said. "Other types of humor can be edgy."

Haley said he was not interested in launching an online
network per se as much as a series of webisodes with some
degree of brand integration. So-called "destination site"
strategies have largely fallen out of favor in the wake of
Bud.TV, which quickly went flat.

Carl's Jr., home of the Six Dollar Burger and other manly
treats, last year edited commercials for a sandwich with "flat
buns," which featured a fetching teacher dancing on her
classroom desk, because of complaints from educators.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter

This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog

YouTube suit called threat to online communication




By LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press Writer



Google's lawyers made the claim in papers filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan as the company responded to Viacom Inc.'s latest lawsuit alleging that the Internet has led to "an explosion of copyright infringement" by YouTube and others.

The back-and-forth between the companies has intensified since Viacom brought its lawsuit last year, saying it was owed damages for the unauthorized viewing of its programming from MTV, Comedy Central and other networks, including such hits as "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart."

In papers submitted to a judge late Friday, Google said YouTube "goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works."

It said that by seeking to make carriers and hosting providers liable for Internet communications, Viacom "threatens the way hundreds of millions of people legitimately exchange information, news, entertainment and political and artistic expression."

Google said YouTube was faithful to the requirements of the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, saying the federal law was intended to protect companies like YouTube as long as they responded properly to content owners' claims of infringement.

On that score, Viacom says Google has set a terrible example.

In a rewritten lawsuit filed last month, Viacom said YouTube consistently allows unauthorized copies of popular television programming and movies to be posted on its Web site and viewed tens of thousands of times.

Viacom said it had identified more than 150,000 unauthorized clips of copyrighted programming — including "SpongeBob SquarePants," "South Park" and "MTV Unplugged" episodes and the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" — that had been viewed "an astounding 1.5 billion times."

The company said its count of unauthorized clips represents only a fraction of the content on YouTube that violates its copyrights.

It said Google and YouTube had done "little or nothing" to stop infringement.

"To the contrary, the availability on the YouTube site of a vast library of the copyrighted works of plaintiffs and others is the cornerstone of defendants' business plan," Viacom said.

This content was originally posted on http://mootblogger.com/ © 2008 If you are not reading this text from the above site, you are reading a splog